)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "eebb821b1adaf2db7662fc1c3ff4e9fcfe59a694",
      "tree": "a3d3cf5f8c20d03fccdc0808537904da63e74938",
      "parents": [
        "7e56bd41cde4e489a11050d9e340bf8b5692d9e8"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Vladimir Marko",
        "email": "vmarko@google.com",
        "time": "Tue Jun 05 14:57:24 2018 +0100"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Vladimir Marko",
        "email": "vmarko@google.com",
        "time": "Thu Jun 21 16:12:28 2018 +0100"
      },
      "message": "Implement Integer.valueOf() intrinsic for PIC.\n\nAnd fix the intrinsic for JIT even in case when someone\nmesses up the IntegerCache using reflection. Two cases are\nexposed with a regression test (one that previously failed\nrandomly and one that failed 100%) but other crashes were\npossible; for example, we would need a read barrier for\narray reads when elements are not guaranteed to be in the\nboot image.\n\nThe new approach loads references only from the boot image\nlive objects array which cannot be touched by reflection.\nThe referenced objects and IntegerCache.cache are exposed\nand can lead to weird behavior but not crashes.\n\nOn x86, the pc_relative_fixups_86 actually checks the cache\nan additional time but discrepancies between this check and\nthe location building at the beginning of codegen should be\nOK as the HIsX86ComputeBaseMethodAddress should be added\nfor PIC regardless of whether pc_relative_fixups_86 thinks\nthe method is intrinsified or not.\n\nTest: 717-integer-value-of\nTest: Pixel 2 XL boots.\nTest: m test-art-host-gtest\nTest: testrunner.py --host --optimizing --pictest --npictest\nTest: testrunner.py --host --jit\nTest: testrunner.py --target --optimizing --pictest --npictest\nTest: testrunner.py --target --jit\nBug: 71526895\nChange-Id: I89b3245a62aba22980c86a99e2af480bfa250af1\n"
    }
  ]
}