)]}'
{
  "log": [
    {
      "commit": "b813ca14be33f7db8b7049c3b08a1eb776f25d1b",
      "tree": "4757b96eb5efd3a0e992f7f399ea479e7b5426c8",
      "parents": [
        "30e015c442c8033390c30d2f293604723c29bc75"
      ],
      "author": {
        "name": "Nicolas Geoffray",
        "email": "ngeoffray@google.com",
        "time": "Thu Feb 16 22:08:29 2017 +0000"
      },
      "committer": {
        "name": "Nicolas Geoffray",
        "email": "ngeoffray@google.com",
        "time": "Mon Feb 27 10:27:42 2017 +0000"
      },
      "message": "Implement code sinking.\n\nSmall example of what the optimization does:\n\nObject o \u003d new Object();\nif (test) {\n  throw new Error(o.toString());\n}\n\nwill be turned into (note that the first user of \u0027o\u0027\nis the \u0027new Error\u0027 allocation which has \u0027o\u0027 in its\nenvironment):\nif (test) {\n  Object o \u003d new Obect();\n  throw new Error(o.toString());\n}\n\nThere are other examples in 639-checker-code-sinking.\n\nRitz individual benchmarks improve on art-jit-cc from\n5% (EvaluateComplexFormulas) to 23% (MoveFunctionColumn)\non all platforms.\n\nTest: 639-checker-code-sinking\nTest: test-art-host\nTest: borg job run\nTest: libcore + jdwp\n\nbug:35634932\nbug:30933338\n\nChange-Id: Ib99c00c93fe76ffffb17afffb5a0e30a14310652\n"
    }
  ]
}